🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people buried in resting places at risk from coastal erosion argue that indecision over how to address the issue is creating unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

An Impending Danger to Historic Churchyards

The council have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being consumed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the issue details a range of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure locations. Authorities maintain it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They intended this to be their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the coast lies the grave of a ex-soldier who died while working overseas. His parent expressed she lost sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly trouble me to consider this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to handle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Several families are calling for additional coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to continue for now. Others contend the time for relocation is drawing near.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with residents.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the options. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need productive local conversations to discover the right solutions for each village.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in resurrection, providing a theological viewpoint on the physical loss of hallowed earth.